Shiffy180 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

my god. of course it requires energy input. it runs on water. it doesnt claim to be a perpetual motion machine. just like a normal car where the running motor recharges the battery that it uses for ignition, the running motor in a water car recharges the battery that the car uses for electrolysis. not perpetual motion, just efficient. thats all it claims to be.

yocbjone (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

haha, water prices! nice one.so why dont all the car manufactures use this technology again?

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

So then you actually do realize that this system requires an energy input to keep running....

Shiffy180 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

you probably shouldnt be mentioning a perpetual motion machine if you dont know what it is, becuase needing to input energy into a system is what separates a perpetual motion machine from a normal one.

alanfromdarwen (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

BET THIS WAS APRIL FOOLS DAY JOKE....

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"not all the water is output as water through the exhaust, so you would have to keep inputting water even if you collected it. also water isnt the only thing coming out of the exhaust."Anyway, my point, which apparently flew right over your head, is that just because you have to replace the water doesn't mean it isn't a perpetual motion machine.

Shiffy180 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

not all the water is output as water through the exhaust, so you would have to keep inputting water even if you collected it. also water isnt the only thing coming out of the exhaust.

XxRoycexX (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

this guy is probably dead.

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"Arrow for an electro technologist you sure are quick to dismiss that maybe these guys just have invented some new tech for solving the energy loss issue of electrolysis..."Nah. For it to work the way they say (i.e. both keep the electrolysis going AND move the car), there has to be more energy coming out than going in. That's impossible according to the laws of thermodynamics.

ArrowHead83 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

"What the hell!!! This stuff has been out for 2 years and there's next to 0 coverage for this!!! This is BULLSHIT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"Actually it's been out a lot longer. The "water fuel" scam has been around, on and off, for the last 10 or 15 years *at least*. Look up Stanley Meyer.