|
centralnyguy37 (October 2, 2008 at 5:20 pm)
If you didn't have your head up your ass you would know that my posting response to another dip shit like your self on this video was making that exact point. That 60K a years isn't good money. I would post the individuals comment below I was responding to so you could see how ignorant you are. But apparently the owner of this video did not like the comment I was responding to and had it removed. I went to your channel by the way and saw your pic. Your as a dumb as you look.
NoFreeSpeechonYT (October 1, 2008 at 8:36 pm)
Who gives a fuck buddy? NY, New York city, who cares? The fact you think 60K a year is good money is laughable no matter where you live! You couldn't even buy a house on that kind of money! LOL! And anyone who defends Kent Hovind is a fucking retard. Brainwashed is believing in religion and Kent Hovind you sorry fuck.
centralnyguy37 (October 1, 2008 at 6:36 pm)
Your a prime example of why profiling needs to be stopped in this world. I'm in upstate NY dip shit. Not NY City. Try to use your head. 60k is good money up here. Just the fact that you assumed I was from NY city when there are in fact 10 million other New Yorkers in upstate is is a very good indication your brain washed and pay to much attention to the media. Educate yourself with facts. Not with liberal TV media garbage.
NoFreeSpeechonYT (October 1, 2008 at 1:48 pm)
If you believe what Kent Hovind says then I have a bridge I'd like to sell you. He's in prison for lying and stealing from idiots just like you. And 60K a year isn't big money, especially in NY. You're a peon for that kind of money. Hell, you could make 150K a year driving a taxi! So go back to cleaning that office and quit bothering people with your creationist nonsense.
NoFreeSpeechonYT (October 1, 2008 at 1:23 pm)
When you choose academia as your profession, you should know what you're getting into. It's a political nightmare full of inflated egos and cronyism. If you're not one of the "good old girl" network, you're nothing. Hard work doesn't necessarily mean success.
milkgodnl (September 7, 2008 at 10:23 pm)
(1) Our Teachers Unions must press for low part-time to full-time faculty ratios as a condition for regional accreditation. .. (2) When I earned my M.S. in Computer Science, my starting salary in industry was higher that my Chair's. .. (3) Deans are the first to notice if youv'e been published in a prestigious journal -- if you had any trouble with them before, you wouldn't now. (4) I bring my own markers to class and take them when I leave, and supply absolutely **nothing** to my students.
Jitpring (September 1, 2008 at 7:19 am)
Are we working under the assumption that there is fairness in this world? Friends, this is a ruthless world. Such are the fruits of the fall.
Nullifidian (August 16, 2008 at 12:55 am)
Furthermore, John Lennox does *not* have three doctoral degrees. Lennox is a *real* academic and therefore doesn't need to rely on rattling off degrees to establish his intellectual legitimacy in the way that your creationist heroes do.Nor is John Lennox a creationist, except in the sense that any Christian believes in God as the Creator, which would also make many evolutionary biologists like Theodosius Dobzhansky 'creationists'. So what would be the point of watching the debate with Dawkins?
Nullifidian (August 16, 2008 at 12:50 am)
People have pointed out Hovind's lies at length and in depth. It doesn't seem to have made the slightest difference to his defenders like yourself. Furthermore, nobody but high school debate teams cares about "ad hominem attacks". Pointing out that Hovind has a Ph.D. from a diploma mill and is currently in prison for tax evasion lets us know that we're dealing with a con man. Though it has no fancy Latin name, buying the lies of con men is a far larger source of avoidable error in the world.
centralnyguy37 (August 11, 2008 at 2:55 am)
If Kent Hovind was such a liar, Then why not point out the lies as opposed to launching ad hominem attacks ? All the liberals he debated were good for rebutting with were things such as " Oh he's in jail or has fake Phd". Also I would suggest you take a look at the debate on You Tube between John Lenox and Richard Dawkins . John Lenox holding three doctorate degrees could hardly be considered an unintelligent or uneducated man as you have eluded to creation being in your previous statement . |
