wizardangel (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

I am a artist that uses a fractal program-apophysis and can duplacate many cosmic displays we see in the space photos-plasma feilds display many scared geometry basics princables also found in many crop circles-the wrapping and bundleling of DNA also requires these very same mathmatics-electric design holds the key to everything-energy never dies,it reorgaizes to suit a new enviorment- done with mathmatics often scared geometry quickly becomes aparent-22grams of electroplasma found peace THXZ!

HerbDangerous (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

As far as the 4 elements (fire, water, air, and earth) are concerned, plasma defines the element of fire best. I used to wonder about those elements alot and could readily see solids, gases, and liquids, but the element of fire was a little elusive until now.

theone6837 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Why not self-educate yourself:holoscience . comelectric-cosmos . orgplasmacosmology . net

majorvoltage (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Did you intend that reply for someone else?

soupdragon42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

What has distance got to do with it? They both fall of with the square of the distance? Read a textbook or two...

kanajlo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

EM is 10^39 more powerful than gravity...over comparatively short distances.

soupdragon42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This is a YouTube vid -- an introduction to the emerging paradigm. It is not a peer reviewed paper. What do you expect in < 10 mins?

majorvoltage (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

This video explained absolutely nothing and was a complete waste of time. State your hypothesis and supporting evidence.

valhala56 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

Well you sound like a Hoyle Steady state fan, There is much evidence for inflation, Cosmic Background radition, Redshift yes. Also I don't know if Black holes are beside the point in reference to EM but the intense gravity of blackholes are more powerfull then even EM. I may also have this incorrect but some theorists state that gravity has been leaking from the universe, (they are testing this now) well if that is the case then gravity was much more intense in the past.

soupdragon42 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)

The alleged expansion of the universe is based on a very tenuous interpretation of Redshift, let alone the alleged acceleration of same. Look up the work of Halton Arp, which based on observation, not ideology.