|
cdddraftsman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"JFK wanted to basically stop the Cold War which meant $ losses for the military-industrial complex"How do you "stop the cold war" when the sworn enemy won't stop trying to detroy you ? That's another silly ass invented fantasy by kooksters !
SOCOMJ3SUS (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Interesting point. However if someone were to be picked for framing. who better than Oswald?
peacebeyours (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Just a thought here, hogger129. I agree that there are a lot of political murders globally. But with JFK, it really could be just Oswald guilty of this. Oswald was an absolute nutcase. The guy was crazy enough to go from being in the Marines, to defecting from our country to the then USSR, just because he wanted to believe in Marxism. That kinda crap was unheard of by the public back then - the "Commie" scare was really out there, and yet Oswald went even further.
hogger129 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
And don't pull out the old, if it was that big, people would talk. Well people DID talk, and they were killed, or silenced, or discredited in some way. There is so much disinformation out there, it causes you to keep guessing, like a game. And it gets you nowhere further than you started. You just have to think abt what makes sense and is logical. All these people that "died" mysteriously probably aren't just plain deaths. They are political murders. To hide something. Look at Watergate or IC.
hogger129 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I think we can also agree that there was a very high level of cover up going on after these events took place. Why? If the government had no involvement, why cover it all up? The Warren Commission was set up to fail. The HSCA got us nowhere. The gov't is talking about other top secret projects and other CIA operations, yet it refuses to go into the "whole Bay of Pigs thing." Why? Why the hell would Ruby murder Oswald? Oswald was probably going to be a shooter, and was in on it, yet was framed.
hogger129 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
A shot from the other side of the TSBD, when the limo was traveling toward Oswald's supposed location, instead of waiting until it was going down Elm Street. There's just too many strange coincidences and I can't buy into the fact that Oswald did it alone, with help or at all. There is more convincing evidence of higher involvement. Government involvement. Mafia couldn't do any of the changing of the route, or S.S. supplements being rejected. Logic suggests higher involvement.
hogger129 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
(cont'd) It also doesn't explain why the parade route was changed. Or why so many open windows were allowed in a city as hostile as Dallas? Even if the windows were all open, in a city as hostile as Dallas, there should not have been a parade thru there at all, or there should have been a "military presence." It doesn't explain the strangely mysterious people who were spotted in Dealy Plaza that day. Plus there would have been a freakin tree in the way of the TSBD. Why not shoot from other side?
daejeon4567 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
regarding the video, why was Rybka and the other agent called off? And has anyone heard about the fate of Rybka and the other agent? I heard Rybka died of a heart attack in 1975. He would have been in his 30's!
hogger129 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
cddraftsman: I would even go so far as to say Oswald didn't pull the trigger at all. There is just simply not enough "convincing" evidence against him. There are too many coincidental things and strangely mysterious things to it all. If you want, I will send you a video that makes a good point that shots came out of the Dal-Tex Building, proving Oswald did not act alone. I just can't buy it that Oswald did it all on his own. It doesn't explain the Secret Service standdown?
hogger129 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
daejon4567: I feel we can both agree there. Alot of people say Kennedy liked and worked with the CIA, and I think this was only more true at the beginning of his term. By '63, his enemies were everywhere. Like Caesar. Ideally, he was doing what was right. Trying to bring about peace. I feel it was more about money. Kennedy wanted to basically stop the Cold War which meant profit losses for the military-industrial complex. That's where Bush and Nixon come in. |
