|
1Trainwreck (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I don't know. Maybe you should ask the folks who aired the obviously fake plane crash videos. They might know.watch?v=zQTsiLX3XbA watch?v=63BNIz8IIng watch?v=cpw4FZcfiqM
thoku4u (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
DAMN dude u still at it WAKE THE FUCK UP already!! we are going toward new world order and u still think 911 was NOT an inside job??
simunpd34 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
ok.. so if it was not a 737 or 727 with 45 people.. can i ask u then where are those 45 people??
JSSTyger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
goodI just hope your sources aren't referencing NIST for their data.
JSSTyger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"Da, ok, show me one of your experts who says that 9/11 was an inside job. Someone who actually uses credible evience and/or has reviewed the evidence."WHOA WAIT A SECOND. DA324 DOESN'T HAVE TO SHOW YOU ANYTHING. YOU YOURSELF DON'T PROVIDE EXPERT OPINIONS (NOT THE ONE'S I HAVE ASKED FOR) SO WHY DO YOU KEEP REQUESTING THING.YOUR METHODS ARE WRONG MAN...JUST WRONG.
qualityrkc (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
you are wrong bud...you shouldn't watch cnn or fox...it is bad for you
da324 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I consider experts structural engineers, demolition persons, physics professors, and the engineers who designed the towers etc. I don't have all of that info available, so I maybe i'm not credible. I've done enough research to understand many people more qualified than us say the story doesn't add up. As far as the 9/11 commission report, have you read it? You're right about the intent of the report. Knowing that, you should read it and see for yourself why it doesn't cut it. Thanks...
JSSTyger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
just post your counter-evidence that says free fall over a 2.5 second time interval does not matteri want a linki posted the physics profs video and he says its its evidence of a lie. All I'm doing is relaying his message.
JSSTyger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
JSS, you're free fall argument is that 'for "2.5 seconds WTC7 was in free fall'. In order for their to be an anomoly the collapse of the building the whole collapse would have to be in free fall, not just the last section of the building. Your 2.5 second crap is just one part of the building in which there is no way to tell how much mass is involved in that one section. "Again you are talking out of your ass instead of posting links. Yawn.
JSSTyger (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
"JSS, when he's told its world trade center he second guesses himself. Then he admits he doesn't know the building."Do ya think that could be maybe because he believed the official story beforehand? And he thought WTC7 had been demo'ed days after the attacks. He always thought it was a demo. He just didn't know it fell on 911 and was just realizing implications of his responses.If he was going to lie he would lie in favor of the official story. The other way wouldn't make sense. |