|
DrunkenPanda12 (August 20, 2008 at 7:48 pm)
They did test it...and that's were they came up with the results so yeah...
icyplanetnhc (August 20, 2008 at 2:19 am)
If the military tested that then they can highlight the shortcomings and then have the manufacturer fix them. The adhesive can be fixed, so it's no excuse that the military shouldn't test it.
xXBioRisingXx (August 18, 2008 at 1:40 pm)
realy good! how much $ costs it?
DrunkenPanda12 (August 18, 2008 at 3:53 am)
I don't know how many times other people posted this but, extreme heat and diesel based oil melts completely melts the glue that holds those ceramic plates together, after the glue melts, each and every will cut through the armor like butter. that is why the army has banned it so that soldiers don't get their armor melted and then blamed when that armor doesn't protect them.
USsnipes (August 17, 2008 at 3:24 am)
thats bullshit that the military isnt using this armor. they banned it before they even tested it. the designer of the intercepter, standard issue body armor for soldeirs, even said that he would take dragon skin over the intercepter.
naujitii (August 16, 2008 at 3:28 pm)
If for some reason I'm going to war, I would not go without Dragonskin and a M16A4 assault rifle.
PCXPBOY (August 12, 2008 at 10:45 am)
ya we could have saved millions if we didnt get into this fuckin war in the first place.
PCXPBOY (August 12, 2008 at 10:42 am)
i love this host so oldschool but in a funny way
Argosthor013 (August 12, 2008 at 9:46 am)
I think the military took it off, it takes alot fo money to run tv shows.
craZzZystuff1 (August 12, 2008 at 6:55 am)
is this show still on? i haven;t seen it in a while. |
