|
BizarreBall (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
I know, my point was that if the Russian tundra melts we are in BIG trouble. As for cow farts, they actually generate 18% of world's global warming pollution - and why? Well, as population grows we need more cattle to feed us.
mrmaciejm (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Oh... Another doomsday prophecy. OK, it is melting, there will be changes in current and climate patterns. So... let`s get ready. There is no need to make videos with Arab music in the background. So much money spend on research just to say "i am worried that the ice is melting", what a scientist.
uzumakiarual (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
thanks 4 the information!hahaha google haarp! lulz
MysteryHunter00 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
The one thing this video did do, it made people think. Most of us are not educated in all the sciences that arrive at conclusions about our global climate. At this point in time, from what I have read thus far, is that are far as we know it could be a natural occurrences, but our output of noxious pollutants are contributing to the hastening of global warming. There are so many elements that contribute to our global climate, one huge volcano eruption could change everything in a heart beat.
ash4432 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
clearly you dont get it. C02 traps more heat the more moister the more heavy snow fall it snow in kenya 2 months ago artic penguins washing up on brazil
ytusergmail (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Good one vvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvvffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbbb
Merany1 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
They say here that Antartica has been expanding over the last 30 years as a result of warmer ocean water which leads to evaporation and an increase in snow fall. So expanding ice is a result of CO2. Give me a break!If you cannot see that NASA has an agenda and completely one sided view, then I don´t know what to say.
Eaacker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Again, the solar output has not increased substantially in recent geological history. But, don't take the word of someone with an actual degree in physics. Go ahead and believe whatever John Stossel tells you to. We wouldn't want to actually listen to Science. Those "theories," or rather hypothesizes you are referring to have been proven not to be the case by Solar researchers armed with new instrumentation such as STEREO (Solar TErrestrial RElations Observatory)have made this case.
Eaacker (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Actually that isn't true. I would really be interested in EXACTLY what "history" you are sighting. Ice Core data from the antarctic is a much more reliable figure because it yields climate data over many thousands of years. The fact is we have never seen a natural warming event happen this quickly.
swarbrickman (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
i love NASA =D |
