|
tbotn (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
There's no way a 3 year old could have that sort of motor neurological dexterity. Most likely fake, if not, very exploitive parents.
mklitt (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
this kid is 12, like the gymnasts!
awesomeSimon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Haha, you think I was serious? I wonder whos the dumbass...
imnotaballer (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
u cant luckily solve a rubiks cube dumbass
YANKEESFTW16 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
thats amazing! i wish i had the smaller rubiks cube with the just the 4
hvure648shf8s (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wah??!!! thats a smart girl!
zilvenda (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
that doesnt count that girl or (thing) is chinese their to damn good at evrything. my theory is that they dumped that creature in radioactive swamp
GringoDana (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Not luck, you can see her solve each layer at a time. I am amazed she can remember the algorithms for the top layer. Very impressive!
Guenwyhvar (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
wow jutroamnesiax you're the idiot. you need to know more than three algs and even if you need to remember them, shes 3 years old and yet she remembers the algs. You probably couldnt talk let alone do a rubiks cube when you were 3.
awesomeSimon (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
luck |
